Sergey Brin AI Breakthrough Needs an End to Remote Work
Updated at:
3/6/2025
Edited and Reviewed by Hey It's AI editors
Sergey Brin wants AGI progress to happen in the office, not remotely. Do long hours and in-person work really drive breakthroughs?
Sergey Brin's AI Breakthrough Needs an End to Remote Work
Alright, developers and AI enthusiasts, buckle up! Google's co-founder Sergey Brin has re-entered the chat, and he's got a hot take: Want to crack artificial general intelligence (AGI)? Drop the pajama pants and get back to the office. Oh, and while you're at it, maybe consider a cozy little 60-hour work week. Sounds fun, right?
Work Harder, Not Smarter?
Brin, who stepped away from Google in 2019, has apparently been spending his time thinking about how humans can supercharge AI development. His conclusion? More human hours in the office. Not just any hours, but long, grueling, full-commute, stale-office-coffee hours.
Of course, Google's teams are already armed with the latest iteration of its AI, Gemini, which is supposed to boost productivity and help automate tasks. But Brin seems to believe that progress toward true AGI—the kind of intelligence that can think and reason like a human—needs more than just AI-enhanced workflows. It needs… well, more humans trying harder.
Does AGI Really Need More Human Elbow Grease?
Now, let's ask the big question: Can we really brute-force our way to AGI by making everyone work more? Anyone who's spent time debugging at 2 AM knows that tired brain cells don't always spark the brightest solutions. And let's be real—if the key to AGI were just 'grind harder,' wouldn't we already have robots doing our jobs?
Brin believes that deep collaboration and spontaneous office brainstorming are essential for big breakthroughs, and, to be fair, some of the best ideas do happen in random hallway conversations. But does that mean remote work should be canceled entirely?
The Remote vs. In-Office Debate Rages On
The remote work debate has been going on for years, and this isn't the first time tech's heavyweights have weighed in. While companies like Google and Meta have pushed for more in-office presence, others argue that productivity and innovation can thrive in flexible environments. After all, if AGI is supposed to be so game-changing, shouldn't it be able to help us be productive from anywhere?
Would forcing developers into the office really lead to AGI, or just more burned-out engineers? Maybe instead of making people work 60-hour weeks, we let AI do more of the lifting. You know, the whole promise of artificial intelligence?
What Do You Think?
So, is Brin on to something, or is this just another tech leader underestimating the merits of work-life balance? Would you trade remote flexibility for a shot at achieving AGI sooner? Or does this just sound like an unnecessary push to get people commuting again?
Drop your thoughts below—preferably after getting a full night's sleep.
Get to know the latest AI news
Join 2300+ other AI enthusiasts, developers and founders.
Sergey Brin is back with a spicy take: Want AGI? Ditch remote work and grind 60-hour weeks in the office. But wait—does innovation come from exhaustion or actual collaboration? Can AI really not thrive in pajama-clad productivity? Or is this just another case of 'back to the office' nostalgia? What do you think?
Related AI Tools
- CommentsShare Your ThoughtsBe the first to write a comment.